| 1 |
> |
| 2 |
> On 25-07-2008 11:30:48 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > |
| 4 |
> > > On 25-07-2008 10:11:29 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > > [case "${withval}" in |
| 6 |
> > > > > ""|yes) AC_MSG_ERROR(bad value ${withval} for --with-root- |
| 7 |
> user);; |
| 8 |
> > > > > |
| 9 |
> > > > > (the message actually says you use --with-root-user -> argument |
| 10 |
> "") |
| 11 |
> > > > |
| 12 |
> > > > Yeah, of course... this is because in the ebuild the |
| 13 |
> determination of |
| 14 |
> > > the root user argument fails (that’s the crash from above...) |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > > ah, so you just have a broken portage installed, which I already |
| 17 |
> > > replaced with a newer one, because I already found the problem and |
| 18 |
> > > fixed |
| 19 |
> > > it, but you report it as a problem with the newer portage. Now it |
| 20 |
> > > makes |
| 21 |
> > > sense to me. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > Hehe, yes. But actually the installed and to-be-installed version are |
| 24 |
> the same... while bootstrapping I restarted at a certain stage, and it |
| 25 |
> wanted to re-emerge portage... |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> that's weird, becuse the offending code is not in that version ?!? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Hmmmmm.... strange indeed... |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> Fabian Groffen |
| 35 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
Archives