Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] gcc-config build fails during prefix bootstrap
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:45:13
Message-Id: 20130128214518.GU83094@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] gcc-config build fails during prefix bootstrap by Palmer Dabbelt
1 On 28-01-2013 13:31:05 -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
2 > I'm trying to bootstrap a prefix on an amd64 Red Hat 6 host. I
3 > followed the instructions online
4 >
5 > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap-solaris.xml
6 >
7 > which seem to have worked up to the stage3 part. During the stage3
8 > bootstrap, portage tries to install "gcc-config", which fails with the
9 > following error message
10 >
11 > >>> Compiling source in .../var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-config-1.8-r00.1/work/gcc-config-1.8 ...
12 > make EPREFIX=... CC=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
13 > make: *** No rule to make target `wrapper.c.in', needed by `wrapper.c'. Stop.
14 > emake failed
15 >
16 > Comparing the code for gcc-config in portage to that in gcc-config's
17 > git repo, it seems that the prefix-specific patch
18 >
19 > files/gcc-config-prefix-1.8-r221.patch
20 >
21 > is somehow related to the problem. Is it possible that this patch is
22 > just no longer necessary? A recent commit in gcc-config's repo make
23 > me think that's true
24
25 We're not there yet, there's one commit pending, that we need to sort
26 out, and then the next release of gcc-config should be ready. There is
27 a bug in gcc-config as is, but that's not a compile problem. So I'm not
28 sure why you hit this.
29
30
31 --
32 Fabian Groffen
33 Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature