| 1 |
For lisp and emacs I actually filled a bug request sometime ago because
|
| 2 |
someone saw fit to mask most lisps on prefix:
|
| 3 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521186
|
| 4 |
This is for macos, note that not only lisp are masked but their use flags are too.
|
| 5 |
There should be another bug filled by my friend Steve Trogdon about linux
|
| 6 |
prefix support.
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
François
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> On 7/01/2015, at 05:45, Gibson, John <jgibson@×××××.org> wrote: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Hi JC, |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> You can add per-package accept keywords to particular packages in the same manner as per-package use flags: |
| 15 |
> 1. mkdir $EPREFIX/etc/portage/package.accept_keywords |
| 16 |
> 2. create files in there with per-atom definitions like this: |
| 17 |
> =app-text/dos2unix-6.0.6 ** |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> 3. Now if you try to emerge the package it will ignore the keyword restrictions and try to install it anyways. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Alternatively you can setup an overlay, copy the existing ebuilds into it and modify them so that they work under OS X. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> John |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> On Jan 6, 2015, at 8:15 AM, JC D <mail2jcdx@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
>> Hi Jeremy, |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> Yes it helps ;-) |
| 30 |
>> I checked Macports and found that all my favourite packages are available there. For productivity reasons I have to think about using macports again or give homebrew a try. |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>> The installation problems are mostly related to some basic packages such as lisp packages sbcl and gcl. |
| 33 |
>> It wasn't even possible to install emacs. |
| 34 |
>> However, if helps to improve gentoo_prefix I will go on ;-) |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
>> Could please tell me where exactly I have to add the keyword? "(just add the keyword and it will work)" |
| 37 |
>> You mean in my make.conf? Or how where do I have to add so it will be applied to a certain package. |
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> Thank you! |
| 40 |
>> |
| 41 |
>> |
| 42 |
>> |
| 43 |
>> |
| 44 |
>> Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> schrieb am 4:35 Montag, 5.Januar 2015: |
| 45 |
>> |
| 46 |
>> |
| 47 |
>> |
| 48 |
>> |
| 49 |
>> Hi JC, |
| 50 |
>> |
| 51 |
>> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:54 AM, JC D <mail2jcdx@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 52 |
>> > Hi Group! |
| 53 |
>> > |
| 54 |
>> > I am using gentoo_prefix on a Mac OS 10.10. |
| 55 |
>> > |
| 56 |
>> > I am trying to install some packages, especially scientific stuff like |
| 57 |
>> > maxima/wxmaxima, paraview and mayavi. |
| 58 |
>> > None of these packages works right now and I suspect a major problem with my |
| 59 |
>> > gentoo_prefix. |
| 60 |
>> > The process fails and one of the messages is: "Darwin patch set |
| 61 |
>> > 'darwin-conf' failed to apply!" |
| 62 |
>> > What does this mean? Is this an "error" of the ebuild or do I have some |
| 63 |
>> > configuration problem on my system that need to be fixec? |
| 64 |
>> |
| 65 |
>> There is probably no problem with your Gentoo Prefix installation. It |
| 66 |
>> looks like you are trying to install some packages that have never |
| 67 |
>> been tested and/or ported to to x64-macos architecture. You will have |
| 68 |
>> various levels of success here, ranging from easy (just add the |
| 69 |
>> keyword and it will work) to very difficult (rewrite the poorly |
| 70 |
>> written scientific package build system to support an offset). At |
| 71 |
>> least, if the package exists in Macports, it has some chance of |
| 72 |
>> success in Gentoo Prefix :) |
| 73 |
>> |
| 74 |
>> > My ACCEPT_KEYWORDS ist "~x64-macos". Does this mean I am using a "unstable" |
| 75 |
>> > branch? (This is not from my make.conf) |
| 76 |
>> |
| 77 |
>> Actually, there is no 'stable' concept in Gentoo Prefix. You are |
| 78 |
>> always using latest version of packages. The Gentoo Prefix team simply |
| 79 |
>> does not have the staff to maintain different stable/unstable trees. |
| 80 |
>> It normally works out pretty well by leveraging some of the work of |
| 81 |
>> Gentoo Linux developers and rely on the fact that massively broken |
| 82 |
>> packages do not appear in ~arch on a often. |
| 83 |
>> |
| 84 |
>> > I am asking, because I could e.g. not install eselect-opengl-1.3.1 but I |
| 85 |
>> > after masking this version I could emerge eselect-opengl-1.2.7 without |
| 86 |
>> > problems. |
| 87 |
>> |
| 88 |
>> Hard to say the problem with the latest version. Did you look at the |
| 89 |
>> bug tracker or file an issue? |
| 90 |
>> |
| 91 |
>> |
| 92 |
>> > Would it be possible to set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="+x64-macos" to switch to the |
| 93 |
>> > stable branch? And how do I have to reemerge my system in case I do this? |
| 94 |
>> > |
| 95 |
>> > I am a little desperate because I would like to use gentoo_prefix as a |
| 96 |
>> > replace for Macports. However, right now I get no package installed. |
| 97 |
>> > Please let me know which information you need. Right now I do not know where |
| 98 |
>> > to start... |
| 99 |
>> |
| 100 |
>> |
| 101 |
>> If you have successfully bootstrapped, you actually have several |
| 102 |
>> packages installed :) |
| 103 |
>> |
| 104 |
>> Hope that helps a little bit, |
| 105 |
>> Jeremy |
| 106 |
>> |
| 107 |
>> |
| 108 |
>> |
| 109 |
>> |
| 110 |
> |
Archives