1 |
haubi's suggestions made me look closer at this, and it seems I had some |
2 |
object files that were compiled prior to switching to this new version |
3 |
of gcc in the prefixed path. So when I went to create the actual executable |
4 |
it was unable to link the objects properly. So, I removed all the object |
5 |
files, rebuilt everything with the new gcc, and it seems to be working |
6 |
perfectly now. |
7 |
|
8 |
Thanks for your suggestions, they were right on track. |
9 |
|
10 |
Thanks! |
11 |
|
12 |
----- Original Message ----- |
13 |
From: "Michael Haubenwallner" <haubi@g.o> |
14 |
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o |
15 |
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 5:16:16 AM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago |
16 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] [AIX] gcc issues |
17 |
|
18 |
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 10:01 +0000, Marshall McMullen wrote: |
19 |
> I tried compiling something today after getting my prefixed portage |
20 |
> up and running, and it fails with an error message such as: |
21 |
> |
22 |
> ld: 0711-736 ERROR: Input file M_builder.o: |
23 |
> XCOFF64 object files are not allowed in 32-bit mode. |
24 |
> collect2: ld returned 8 exit status |
25 |
|
26 |
Seems like you've compiled in 64bit mode, but want to link in 32bit |
27 |
mode. |
28 |
|
29 |
What's the commandline to create M_builder.o ? |
30 |
What's the commandline to link your executable/sharedlib ? |
31 |
|
32 |
/haubi/ |
33 |
-- |
34 |
Michael Haubenwallner |
35 |
Gentoo on a different level |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |