| 1 |
On 18-02-2013 14:28:28 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> >> (2) deprecate prefix/linux/${ARCH} profiles, and add |
| 3 |
> >> prefix/linux/13.0/${ARCH} profiles to replace them (this is |
| 4 |
> >> analogous to the approach used for non-prefix profiles) |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> >> I would suggest to go with (2), in order to make things smooth for |
| 7 |
> >> pre-EAPI-5 portage users. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Yes, but given that we've always been on bleeding edge, I'd be fine with |
| 10 |
> > (1) as well. But if someone wants to implement (2), I'm not going to |
| 11 |
> > block that in any way. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Well, if you decide to go with (2), you should probably first update |
| 14 |
> bootstrap-prefix.sh [1] to use a newer portage version, since it |
| 15 |
> currently uses prefix-portage-2.2.01.20837.tar.bz2 which doesn't support |
| 16 |
> EAPI 5. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
We should also do it for the non-linux profiles, I guess. And the |
| 19 |
bootstrap is blocked by the darwin problem with more recent portage |
| 20 |
versions :(((( |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> [1] |
| 23 |
> http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/alt/browser/trunk/prefix-overlay/scripts/bootstrap-prefix.sh?format=txt |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 27 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives