| 1 |
On 03-12-2007 15:01:47 -0500, A. Khattri wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Peter Ansell wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Why wouldn't an svn update to a HTTP server work from behind a |
| 5 |
>> corporate firewall? The prefix does not use rsync for emerge --sync, |
| 6 |
>> it uses subversion, if that is what you are thinking about. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I guess the firewall + proxy server combo doesn't like it: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> $ emerge --sync |
| 11 |
>>>> Starting svn update... |
| 12 |
> svn: REPORT request failed on '/svn/proj/alt/!svn/vcc/default' |
| 13 |
> svn: REPORT of '/svn/proj/alt/!svn/vcc/default': 400 Bad Request |
| 14 |
> (http://overlays.gentoo.org) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Hmmm, yuck. I think it doesn't use the proxy or something. Or maybe it |
| 17 |
does: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#proxy |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If that is what you have, then you're doomed. Unfortunately we (still) |
| 22 |
don't have any alternative to svn. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 27 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives