Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] emake shell
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:29:06
Message-Id: 20090116142902.GC97577@gentoo.org
In Reply to: RE: [gentoo-alt] emake shell by Markus Duft
1 On 16-01-2009 15:09:21 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
2 > >
3 > > On 16-01-2009 13:30:24 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
4 > > > > 3) should this be added in prefix, or in main?
5 > > >
6 > > > Please speak up, if you _don't_ want me to do this as a portage patch
7 > > in the
8 > > > prefix tree. That's what I want to do, if nobody has a problem with
9 > > it ;)
10 > >
11 > > Please don't.
12 >
13 > Ok, so what else then?
14
15 File a bug against the portage team, and try to work out something with
16 Zac.
17
18
19 --
20 Fabian Groffen
21 Gentoo on a different level