Subject |
From |
Date |
Re: [gentoo-alt] For prefix usage, is there any reason for portage to continue support for python <3.6? |
Fabian Groffen |
Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:39:43 |
[gentoo-alt] For prefix usage, is there any reason for portage to continue support for python <3.6? |
Zac Medico |
Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:15:08 |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 |
Benda Xu |
Sun, 05 Jul 2020 08:15:02 |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 |
Sid Spry |
Sat, 04 Jul 2020 20:37:53 |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 |
Benda Xu |
Sat, 04 Jul 2020 15:37:27 |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 |
Benda Xu |
Fri, 03 Jul 2020 05:41:16 |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 |
Sid Spry |
Fri, 03 Jul 2020 02:14:07 |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 |
Benda Xu |
Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:23:55 |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 |
Sid Spry |
Thu, 02 Jul 2020 15:40:56 |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 |
Benda Xu |
Wed, 01 Jul 2020 07:59:11 |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 |
Fabian Groffen |
Wed, 01 Jul 2020 06:28:31 |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Gentoo Prefix bootstrap fails on Stage 3 due to circular dependencies (dev-lang/python-3.7.7-r2 pulls virtual/libcrypt-1-r1:0/1::gentoo) |
Sam Pfeiffer |
Wed, 01 Jul 2020 02:04:54 |
Re: [gentoo-alt] Please Bump Arm64 Prefix Stage3 |
Sid Spry |
Wed, 01 Jul 2020 00:01:45 |