| 1 |
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:27:38 +0100 |
| 2 |
Graham Murray <gmurray@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Are we looking at the same tree? I have just sync'd and gcc-4.5.1 is |
| 6 |
> still listed in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask and |
| 7 |
> packages.gentoo.org still shows it masked for all arches. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I was a bit surprised myself, but on my system: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
emerge m gcc |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Keywords: 4.5.0:4.5: |
| 15 |
Keywords: 4.5.1:4.5: ~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~s390 ~sh ~sparc ~x86 |
| 16 |
~x86-fbsd |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Both 4.5.0 and 4.5.1 are unmasked. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I'll see if this changes during my next sync. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
But I think I'll keep the 5.4.1 slot regardless. I've already recompiled |
| 23 |
some packages without problem using 5.4.1. I'll keep it as the default compiler |
| 24 |
and slowly let the system rebuild over time. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Frank Peters |
Archives