Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: libkhtml library problem
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:32:40
Message-Id: 200908262231.56862.volkerarmin@googlemail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Re: libkhtml library problem by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Mittwoch 26 August 2009, Duncan wrote:
2 > Mark Haney posted on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:58:09 -0400 as excerpted:
3 > > Th libjpeg.so.62 file is there (in /usr/lib32, it's part of the
4 > > emul-linux-x86 package). It's up to date (the package is), so it can't
5 > > be that (I don't think.)
6 >
7 > emul-linux-x86 packages are all 32-bit, and that's in a lib32 dir as
8 > well. That's not going to help you with 64-bit compiling at all!
9 >
10 > Unless of course you're trying to compile KDE as 32-bit!
11 >
12 > Volker is likely correct. FWIW, the package owning my libjepeg.so.62
13 > here is jpeg-6b-r8 (there might be an update in the last few days, I've
14 > not done one in a week or so). If you're running jpeg-7, as he suggests,
15 > a revdep-rebuild is in order.
16
17 23.8 was the day I updates to jpeg-7 and -compat was not there. More
18 correctly, it was not installed. A friend updated on Monday and -compat was
19 there. So.. it's a bit muddy.
20
21 You have two options:
22 go without -compat. revdep-rebuilt will fix all breakage and you can go on
23 go with -compat, revdep-rebuilt is not needed. But what lies ahead in the
24 future?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: libkhtml library problem Mark Haney <mhaney@××××××××××××.org>