1 |
Thanks... I was looking at the wrong internal portage tree. ;) |
2 |
|
3 |
-J |
4 |
|
5 |
-- |
6 |
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:35:14PM +0200, Christoph Mende wrote: |
7 |
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:09:30 -1000 |
8 |
> Joshua Hoblitt <jhoblitt@××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > Hi Folks, |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > The reason I ask is that there are |
13 |
> > alot of people (i.e., my users) eager for a version of gcc that supports |
14 |
> > openmp (like gcc 4.2.1+) and many of the specialized openmp compilers |
15 |
> > (like onmi) won't build on amd64. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> gcc-4.2.0 and gcc-4.2.1 both support openmp and are in the normal tree. |