Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Peter Humphrey <prh@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Is equery broken, or do I need to rebuild something?
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:08:39
Message-Id: 200704191003.21978.prh@gotadsl.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Is equery broken, or do I need to rebuild something? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Thursday 19 April 2007 03:46:56 Duncan wrote:
2 > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> posted pan.2007.04.19.02.40.11@×××.net,
3 > excerpted below, on Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:40:11 +0000:
4 > > Peter Humphrey <prh@××××××××××.uk> posted
5 > > 200704181029.23951.prh@××××××××××.uk, excerpted below, on Wed, 18 Apr
6 > >
7 > > 2007 10:29:23 +0100:
8 > >> It's number 175050.
9 > >
10 > > OK, report added to it. Looks like a bunch of folks are hitting the
11 > > problem now.
12 >
13 > ... And a fix now in SVN, it appears. =8^)
14
15 And the fix does work for me too, as I assume you'll see from the bug
16 report.
17
18 --
19 Rgds
20 Peter Humphrey
21 Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93
22 --
23 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list