| 1 |
Daniele Salatti wrote: |
| 2 |
> PaulNM wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Daniele Salatti wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> Hi list!! |
| 6 |
>>> "emerge --search openoffice" show that openoffice is masked. Instead, |
| 7 |
>>> there is an unmasked package called openoffice-bin. Does it mean that |
| 8 |
>>> OOo doesn't compile on amd64? |
| 9 |
>>> TIA, Daniele |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>> Yes, in fact, if you do an "emerge -p openoffice" it will tell you it's |
| 13 |
>> masked and has a message that says something like "Don't even think of |
| 14 |
>> trying to compile openoffice, it won't work anyway." |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> PaulNM |
| 18 |
> Thank you!! |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
For posterity, since my AMD64X2 was not on earlier: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Optimus ~ # emerge -p openoffice |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Calculating dependencies |
| 29 |
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "openoffice" have been masked. |
| 30 |
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your |
| 31 |
request: |
| 32 |
- app-office/openoffice-2.0.3 (masked by: package.mask, -amd64 keyword) |
| 33 |
# 2005/10/24 Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> |
| 34 |
# Don't even try to compile openoffice-2.x, it won't work. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or |
| 38 |
refer to the Gentoo Handbook. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
PaulNM |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives