| 1 |
As the title suggests, I'm considering going no-multilib, given that I |
| 2 |
don't use 32-bit software in general, anyway. It would sure save compile |
| 3 |
time on glibc and gcc, and would eliminate the issues I seem to get |
| 4 |
with 32-bit compile failures when I compile glibc using gcc4, as well as |
| 5 |
/greatly/ simplifying my Gentoo life, at a cost of giving up something I |
| 6 |
don't really use anyway. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Question. If I do so, will grub still compile for me, or will I have to |
| 9 |
use grub-static (I /guess/ that's the binary-only ebuild?)? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Hmm... the package.mask for no-multilib includes sys-boot/grub, so I |
| 12 |
apparently answered my own question... Still. |
| 13 |
confirmation/comments/suggestions would be appreciated. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 17 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 18 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 19 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives