1 |
Chris Smart posted <437050B6.7000208@××××××××××××.net>, excerpted below, |
2 |
on Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:16:06 +1100: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>The claim is amd64 compilation is planned for 2.0.2 |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> cheers, for some reason I thought you could compile it on an amd64 arch |
10 |
> but not as an actual 64bit app (ie in 32bit mode using emul). |
11 |
|
12 |
You should be able to compile it as 32-bit, tho from what I've read it's |
13 |
easier to do the 32-bit chroot and do it there than chase down whatever |
14 |
32-bit stuff on 64-bit outside of a chroot. |
15 |
|
16 |
Among other things, the java stuff is problematic, again, from what I've |
17 |
read. For both running the binary package and for compiling from source, |
18 |
the Java stuff tries to use 64-bit Java, which naturally won't work trying |
19 |
to link that against 32-bit OOo. Do it in the chroot, and it can't see |
20 |
anything 64-bit, so it can't link against it. It has no choice but to go |
21 |
32-bit. |
22 |
|
23 |
Of course, the problem is that if this is your first and only 32-bit app |
24 |
you really want to compile, doing an entire chroot just for it is a /lot/ |
25 |
of work. In that case, even I'd probably go with the 32-bit pre-packaged |
26 |
binary. |
27 |
|
28 |
Now what might be the /interesting/ way to do it, for those that have |
29 |
several machines including some x86 machines, would be to compile it from |
30 |
source on them, then try to move it over. (As usual, be very careful |
31 |
about merging 32-bit packages, binary or not, on 64-bit -- they say don't |
32 |
do it at all, but if you manually verify that it's not overwriting |
33 |
anything 64-bit, and manually verify dependencies, it /might/ be made to |
34 |
work. If it breaks, tho, you get to keep the pieces!) |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
38 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
39 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
40 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |