1 |
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Mark Knecht wrote: |
3 |
>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Allan Wegan <allanwegan@××××××××××.de> wrote: |
4 |
>>>> Please turn off the HTML posts. |
5 |
>>> His post is a multipart message containing an additional plaintext |
6 |
>>> version. If you saw the HTML version, your client is broken or |
7 |
>>> misconfigured. |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> -- |
12 |
>>> Allan Wegan |
13 |
>>> <http://www.allanwegan.de/> |
14 |
>>> Jabber: allanwegan@××××××.net |
15 |
>>> OTR-Fingerprint: E4DCAA40 4859428E B3912896 F2498604 8CAA126F |
16 |
>>> Jabber: allanwegan@××××××××××.de |
17 |
>>> OTR-Fingerprint: A1AAA1B9 C067F988 4A424D33 98343469 29164587 |
18 |
>>> ICQ: 209459114 |
19 |
>>> OTR-Fingerprint: 71DE5B5E 67D6D758 A93BF1CE 7DA06625 205AC6EC |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>> Allan, |
22 |
>> I think I found the GMail setting to ensure completely plain |
23 |
>> text responses. Please respond if that doesn't appear to be |
24 |
>> the case. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> While I felt Duncan's response to this issue was a bit heavy handed |
27 |
>> there may have been some change in the way GMail was sending |
28 |
>> emails as I started getting bounces from Linux Lists that won't even |
29 |
>> accept an HTML subpart. I never had those before so hopefully |
30 |
>> this addresses both that and Duncan's issue. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> Cheers, |
33 |
>> Mark |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> If I'm reading this correctly, I'm no expert on this, it shows this here: |
38 |
> |
39 |
> "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8" |
40 |
> |
41 |
> If I'm looking at the right thing, it should be text only. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> I wonder what mine looks like??? |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Dale |
46 |
> |
47 |
> :-) :-) |
48 |
> |
49 |
> |
50 |
|
51 |
Hi Dale, |
52 |
Well, at least your response to my already text version appears |
53 |
to be text also. |
54 |
|
55 |
I think this comes down to somehow my GMail account got a bit |
56 |
flipped somehow. I've never used the area that fixed it so who knows? |
57 |
|
58 |
Anyway, I think it's fixed unless someone points out an issue. |
59 |
|
60 |
Cheers, |
61 |
Mark |