Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Drake Donahue <donahue95@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: can not install nvidia driver
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:29:07
Message-Id: 161E1218BB254FAE9C2CC193F138F3B2@iwillxp333
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: can not install nvidia driver by Peter Bleszynski
1 echo "x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers ~amd64" > /etc/portage/package.keywords
2
3 fixed this problem for me when I upgraded to kernel 2.6.27-r5 from 2.6.25-r7
4 ----- Original Message -----
5 From: Peter Bleszynski
6 To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
7 Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 2:53 AM
8 Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: can not install nvidia driver
9
10
11 I was able to install nvidia-drivers while running gentoo-sources-2.6.27-r4 using the ebuild posted here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246425
12
13
14 On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
15
16 Mansour Al Akeel <mansour.alakeel@×××××.com> posted
17 49433267.1090205@×××××.com, excerpted below, on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:56:23
18 -0400:
19
20
21 > In file included from
22 > /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.09/work/NVIDIA-Linux-
23 x86_64-173.14.09-pkg2/usr/src/nv/nv.c:14:
24 > /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-173.14.09/work/NVIDIA-Linux-
25 x86_64-173.14.09-pkg2/usr/src/nv/nv-linux.h:107:27:
26 > error: asm/semaphore.h: No such file or directory
27
28
29 The arch-x86 (including 64-bit) header files were reorganized in kernel
30 2.6.27, and as that says, asm/semaphore.h (or more like asm-x86/
31 semaphore.h) no longer exists in .27. I won't install proprietaryware so
32 no nvidia for me and no direct experience with it to help you with, but
33 it's likely nVidia hasn't updated to take account of that yet (or if so
34 it'd probably be with the newest drivers, which may not even be in
35 portage yet let alone stable).
36
37 You did mention switching your running kernel back to 2.6.26.x, which
38 should work, but did you switch your kernel symlink back to it as well?
39 If not, it's probably still pointing at the 2.6.27.x kernel, thus you'd
40 still be getting the error.
41
42 --
43 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
44 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
45 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman