| 1 |
On 28/10/06, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I think the [v] thing is a fairly new addition to the script. I'm not |
| 3 |
> sure (I could go look but I don't want to parse thru all that scripting |
| 4 |
> to verify), but I'd guess the v's indicate an actual fix. Thus, you can see |
| 5 |
> some of those had two places to fix the first time thru, others had one, |
| 6 |
> some had none (they already had both the old and new paths). On the |
| 7 |
> second and subsequent runs, they all had the fixes already, so no v's, |
| 8 |
> even tho there were still matches triggering the "fixing" messages. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
After looking at the code it seems that [v] means that a patch was |
| 11 |
added (or changed?) to a diffrent version of GCC and that a [c] means |
| 12 |
that a path to a diffrent chost of gcc was added and/or changed. |
| 13 |
/lib/rcscripts/awk/fixlafiles.awk (around line 252 and 296) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
As it is in AWK and I'm not good at AWK I might be wrong. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
/AnMaster |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives