Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: No kdm after 2005.0 upgrade
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:04:38
Message-Id: pan.2006.01.28.16.02.24.681040@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] No kdm after 2005.0 upgrade by Richard Fish
1 Richard Fish posted
2 <7573e9640601280603ye1e78bbid150d4c4036d0d50@××××××××××.com>, excerpted
3 below, on Sat, 28 Jan 2006 08:03:29 -0600:
4
5 > On 1/28/06, Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote:
6 >> That should be DISPLAYMANAGER=xdm
7 >
8 > Er, of course, I meant 'kdm'
9
10 ... and to put a finer point on it, the difference from the original is
11 the "_". There shouldn't be any.
12
13 Good catch! I didn't see it until you pointed it out, and even then,
14 didn't see it until your second post.
15
16 --
17 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
18 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
19 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
20 http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
21
22
23 --
24 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: No kdm after 2005.0 upgrade Daiajo Tibdixious <daiajo@×××××.com>