Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Humphrey <prh@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:23:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200609232221.24970.prh@gotadsl.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On Saturday 23 September 2006 19:52, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > However, the only difference (CFLAGS wise) that I'm aware of for the AMD |
| 4 | > dual-cores is that they now incorporate SSE3, while my old 242s and I |
| 5 | > presume your 246s don't. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Nope. SSE and SSE2, but not SSE3. According to /proc/cpuinfo, that is. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Rgds |
| 11 | Peter |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone? | Jason Booth <jbooth@××××××××××××××××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone? | "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@××××××××××.net> |