| 1 |
On Thursday 31 August 2006 06:43, Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> wrote |
| 2 |
about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] About gcc 4.1.1': |
| 3 |
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Yeah, but -march might be filtered by the ebuild and -mtune not; I |
| 5 |
> > like using both of them. Similar to this, I have multiple -O flags in |
| 6 |
> > my CFLAGS so the late non-filtered one is active. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> This is not an argument, because when filtering such stuff, we use |
| 9 |
> 'replace-cpu-flags' which filters all of the -march/-mtune/-mcpu |
| 10 |
> options. There's really no point in having them both. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The same goes for the -O filtering. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Damn those pesky developers. ;) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
When will they learn the solution is not to mask out CFLAGS it's to produce |
| 17 |
a patch so the package works with the user's desired CFLAGS. :P |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> So, to put it simple: You lost. :P |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Standard Gentoo User Experience, I guess. ;) j/k. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
"If there's one thing we've established over the years, |
| 25 |
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest |
| 26 |
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability." |
| 27 |
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives