Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Beso <givemesugarr@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Obligatory FF3 question.
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:40:12
Message-Id: d257c3560806180840y499cabb2rcc05cc1be21a6a56@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Obligatory FF3 question. by Mark Haney
1 2008/6/18 Mark Haney <mhaney@××××××××××××.org>:
2
3 > M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
4 >
5 >> Mark Haney wrote:
6 >>
7 >>> So, how's it working? Anyone emerged it yet?
8 >>>
9 >>> The binary is working ... the mirrors are hosed on the source version,
10 >> though. They have the binary version and the checksums don't match.
11 >>
12 >
13 > I was able to get good source. It built and it absolutely hauls the
14 > proverbial ass.
15 >
16
17 have you tried it with the new gnash plugin and the new icedtea (the free
18 openjdk java plugin that seems to be compatible at 90% with java6 ) on amd64
19 arch?
20
21
22
23 --
24 dott. ing. beso

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Obligatory FF3 question. Mark Haney <mhaney@××××××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Obligatory FF3 question. "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@×××××××.net>