1 |
I figured it out with a bit of googling. Apparently what you do is move the |
2 |
page file and then just resize. I've read that it doesn't always work, but |
3 |
with 17.someodd gig freed and linux installed I'm happy. I appreciate the |
4 |
help. |
5 |
|
6 |
-Peter |
7 |
|
8 |
On 4/14/07, Peter Davoust <worldgnat@×××××.com> wrote: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I agree, the partition is apparently also for a diskless recovery. Ok, so |
11 |
> I burnt the recovery discs, and naught. They just want to install a default |
12 |
> image. This is annoying. I'm on the phone with Com--- HP now, and I'm doing |
13 |
> some Googling. I'll let you know if I find anything that works. Any more |
14 |
> ideas would also be greatly appreciated. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> -Peter |
17 |
> |
18 |
> On 4/12/07, Zac <spdrmonkey@×××××.com> wrote: |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Yes, the discs you create with Recovery Manager will do a full factory |
21 |
> > restore on a blank hard drive, they will also re-create that recovery |
22 |
> > partition. I think that the recovery partition is primarily just for |
23 |
> > creating those discs. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > -Zac |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > On 4/11/07, Peter Davoust <worldgnat@×××××.com> wrote: |
28 |
> > > That's what I was considering trying next. Does burning the recovery |
29 |
> > > partition to a DVD via Recovery Manager create a full recovery disk, |
30 |
> > or does |
31 |
> > > it require the funky 6.38 gig recovery partition? |
32 |
> > > |
33 |
> > > -Peter |
34 |
> > > |
35 |
> > > |
36 |
> > > On 4/11/07, Zac <spdrmonkey@×××××.com> wrote: |
37 |
> > > > |
38 |
> > > > I have seen this, and I was able to get around it. I have an hp |
39 |
> > > > laptop that was only available with vista, and I found that if I had |
40 |
> > > > done anything other than boot the vista install, I would only get |
41 |
> > > > about 1 g of space shrinking the drive with the vista |
42 |
> > tool. However, |
43 |
> > > > from a fresh install, well, as fresh as you can get with the revert |
44 |
> > to |
45 |
> > > > factory discs they provide these days, I was able to get my vista |
46 |
> > > > partition down to 15gigs total. So, if you don't have anything |
47 |
> > > > critical installed in vista, you may try reinstalling. Good Luck. |
48 |
> > > > |
49 |
> > > > -Zac |
50 |
> > > > |
51 |
> > > > On 4/11/07, Peter Davoust <worldgnat@×××××.com > wrote: |
52 |
> > > > > Yeah, I tried that but it only got me 587mb. Like Vista is taking |
53 |
> > up a |
54 |
> > > 105 |
55 |
> > > > > gig partition... I think what's happening is that there are files |
56 |
> > at the |
57 |
> > > end |
58 |
> > > > > of the partition as well as the front. Don't know. |
59 |
> > > > > |
60 |
> > > > > -Peter |
61 |
> > > > > |
62 |
> > > > > |
63 |
> > > > > On 4/11/07, Fred < gentoo@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
64 |
> > > > > > Peter Davoust wrote: |
65 |
> > > > > > > That's a good idea, I'll try it. I'm not a Windows fan myself, |
66 |
> > but |
67 |
> > > at |
68 |
> > > > > > > least Vista looks cool. |
69 |
> > > > > > > |
70 |
> > > > > > > On 4/10/07, *Joe Menola* < menola@×××××××××.net |
71 |
> > > > > > > <mailto: menola@×××××××××.net>> wrote: |
72 |
> > > > > > > |
73 |
> > > > > > > On Tuesday 10 April 2007 4:15:17 pm Peter Davoust wrote: |
74 |
> > > > > > > > Ok, so this is sort of a continuation of my previous |
75 |
> > question |
76 |
> > > > > about |
77 |
> > > > > > > > Xserver, HP decided to replace my laptop after a little |
78 |
> > > technical |
79 |
> > > > > > > support |
80 |
> > > > > > > > issue, and now my PC has Vista on a 120 gig hard drive. |
81 |
> > The |
82 |
> > > only |
83 |
> > > > > > > problem is |
84 |
> > > > > > > > that for some reason neither my Gparted Live cd nor my |
85 |
> > gentoo |
86 |
> > > > > > > live cd can |
87 |
> > > > > > > > resize the partition. I'd reinstall everything, but |
88 |
> > Compaq |
89 |
> > > > > > > doesn't like |
90 |
> > > > > > > > providing OS restore disks, and instead put all the |
91 |
> > data on a |
92 |
> > > > > > > separate |
93 |
> > > > > > > > partition. Most likely the restore disk will just setup |
94 |
> > the |
95 |
> > > same |
96 |
> > > > > > > partition |
97 |
> > > > > > > > scheme as before anyway. I've tried using the Vista |
98 |
> > disk |
99 |
> > > > > > > partition utility, |
100 |
> > > > > > > > but it could only give me 587 mb in between the restore |
101 |
> > and |
102 |
> > > OS |
103 |
> > > > > > > partitions. |
104 |
> > > > > > > > It's annoying, does anyone know how to fix it? I've |
105 |
> > tried |
106 |
> > > chkdsk |
107 |
> > > > > > > and defrag |
108 |
> > > > > > > > already, but to no avail. |
109 |
> > > > > > > |
110 |
> > > > > > > The first thing I'd try is zipping the contents of c:\ |
111 |
> > > drive>dvd, |
112 |
> > > > > > > recreate |
113 |
> > > > > > > your partitions and unzip to the smaller c:\ drive. I know |
114 |
> > this |
115 |
> > > > > > > would work |
116 |
> > > > > > > for ntfs. I know nothing about Vista though, and I'm fine |
117 |
> > with |
118 |
> > > that. |
119 |
> > > > > ;) |
120 |
> > > > > > > |
121 |
> > > > > > > -jm |
122 |
> > > > > > > -- |
123 |
> > > > > > > gentoo-amd64@g.o <mailto:gentoo-amd64@g.o > |
124 |
> > > mailing |
125 |
> > > > > list |
126 |
> > > > > > > |
127 |
> > > > > > > |
128 |
> > > > > > You can resize partitions and volumes within Vista itself using |
129 |
> > the |
130 |
> > > > > > 'Disk Management' console program. |
131 |
> > > > > > -- |
132 |
> > > > > > gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
133 |
> > > > > > |
134 |
> > > > > > |
135 |
> > > > > |
136 |
> > > > > |
137 |
> > > > -- |
138 |
> > > > gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
139 |
> > > > |
140 |
> > > > |
141 |
> > > |
142 |
> > > |
143 |
> > -- |
144 |
> > gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
145 |
> > |
146 |
> > |
147 |
> |