1 |
On Tuesday 23 May 2006 14:40, Hamish Marson wrote: |
2 |
> Peter Humphrey wrote: |
3 |
> > On Friday 12 May 2006 19:16, Duncan wrote: |
4 |
> >> You hit the infamous libexpat bug! |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > I did too, and after several attempts to get revdep-rebuild to fix |
7 |
> > the problem I gave up and reinstalled from scratch. Now I can't get |
8 |
> > arts to run - it gobbles 95% CPU from when I log in to when artsd |
9 |
> > gets killed on a cpu overload. I've raised a bug on this. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Infamous expat bug? Would this be where you update libexpat because |
12 |
> something wants the later verison & then everythig fails because it |
13 |
> can't find libexpat.0? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Grr... I hit that last night... I'm still running an emerge -D world |
16 |
> to re-install everything (Since revdep-rebuild failed for me). |
17 |
|
18 |
What you can do to keep a useable system in the meantime is to create a |
19 |
symbolic link from "/usr/lib/libexpat.so.1" to "/usr/lib/libexpat.so.0". As |
20 |
the ABI did not actually change this is sufficient to keep things working |
21 |
while you recompile the stuff. |
22 |
|
23 |
Paul |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Paul de Vrieze |
27 |
Gentoo Developer |
28 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
29 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |