| 1 |
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 17:20, Ryan Sims wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 1/9/07, Piotr Jaroszyñski <peper@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 16:27, Einar S. Ids¸ wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Some further info: I just remembered that I also changed the symlink |
| 5 |
> > > for /etc/make.profile. For some reason I changed it to point to |
| 6 |
> > > /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.0, which doesn't seem |
| 7 |
> > > right... I suppose I should rather have used |
| 8 |
> > > /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2006.1/(desktop|server)? |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > Did I just stupidly break my system? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > You have switched to non-multilib profile... Switch it back asap and |
| 13 |
> > reemerge whatever you emerged on invalid profile. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Is that possible? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> from http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-amd64-faq.xml#multilib : |
| 18 |
> "Currently you cannot switch from a no-multilib to a multilib-enabled |
| 19 |
> profile, so think over your decision twice before you use the |
| 20 |
> no-multilib profile." |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The reason it's not possible is because it breaks the system. |
| 23 |
portage does not prevent you from changing to an incompatible profile. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives