| 1 |
Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 18:16 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Wednesday 25 January 2006 17:59, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> I build with -j5 and 1GB of ram. If it ooms for you, you have a broken |
| 6 |
>>> kernel, get a better one. (I use ck-sources, and have never seen an OOM |
| 7 |
>>> of any variety) |
| 8 |
>> I used a wide array of kernels. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> OOM is easy: |
| 11 |
>> compile kde-base or kdelibs with kdeenablefinal or wesnoth. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Been there, done that, no OOM. Your kernel is broken. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
All it should take is some extra running programs taking up memory, a |
| 16 |
few memory hunry parallel g++ compiles and memory will become all used |
| 17 |
up. There isn't anything much a kernel can do except to send the |
| 18 |
oom-killer for a visit... Although Volker's reports in another part of |
| 19 |
this thread where he stated that swap was not used does indeed seem |
| 20 |
strange, if not broken. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Marco |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives