| 1 |
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Crístian Viana |
| 2 |
<cristiandeives@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> or add a line to /etc/portage/package.license if you want to accept a |
| 4 |
> license to one specific ebuild. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Branko Badrljica <brankob@××××××××××.com> |
| 7 |
> wrote: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> <SNIP> |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> As far as I can tell so far: |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> ACCEPT_LICENSE="*" will accept all licenses. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> ACCEPT_LICENSE="dlj-1.1" will accept just this license in case someone |
| 18 |
>>> doesn't want to use licensed software without knowing that they've |
| 19 |
>>> added it. |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>>> HTH, |
| 22 |
>>> Mark |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> ACCEPT_LICENSE is mentioned in make.conf manpage. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> I have set it to "* -@EULA dlj-1.1 sun-bcla-java-vm" |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> Branko |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Thanks all. I see the license bits got added on the 10th of October & |
| 32 |
I somehow missed the warnings until now. Nice feature. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Wil |
Archives