Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] x11-drm-20051223 failure - `SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED' undeclared
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:35:37
Message-Id: 5bdc1c8b0601120833r15ed1c19p78cf746ed2395e80@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] x11-drm-20051223 failure - `SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED' undeclared by Richard Fish
On 1/11/06, Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote:
> On 1/11/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: > > I took a quick look at Bugzilla but didn't see anything that > > matched up. Does this work with the Gentoo kernel? > > Builds fine here against suspend2-sources-2.6.15
Interesting kernel choice. I hadn't heard of it. Where does that one come from? It's in portage I see. Is this a Gentoo developed kernel or from some outside working group?
> > > Any other ideas? > > > > Older versions of x11-drm did emerge correctly: > > > > lightning ~ # eix x11-drm > > * x11-base/x11-drm > > Available versions: !4.3.0-r7 20050502 20050807 20051028 20051223 > > Installed: 20050807 > > You are saying x11-drm 20050807 built against 2.6.15??? Or that > 20050807 built against some earlier kernel version (which is what I > suspect you really meant to say!)
No, the earlier version was built against something earlier.
> > I would say try an earlier/later/different kernel or rt patch version.
Cheers, Mark
> > -Richard > > -- > gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list > >
-- gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies