| 1 |
On Freitag, 22. Juni 2007, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 22 June 2007 16:01:56 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Freitag, 22. Juni 2007, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > I'm beginning to think there must be a problem with my motherboard. Can |
| 5 |
> > > anyone suggest something else for me to check? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > yes, wait for .22 kernel. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> The vanilla sources I've tried are .22 and they behave the same. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
.22 is not released yet - and the rcX seem to be badly broken in the |
| 12 |
filesystem area. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
There are reported problems with xfs, ext3 and reiserfs using systems. I would |
| 15 |
stay away from them until 2.6.22 is released. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> > AFAIR There is a bugfix about scheduling on dual core cpus in the |
| 19 |
> > upcoming release. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I forgot to say that these are dual sockets, not cores. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> > Aside from that, if everything else is more or less spreaded equally, I |
| 24 |
> > would suspect BOINC and not the kernel. But you can try different |
| 25 |
> > schedulers (Con Kolivas' rsdl or what it is called or Ingo Molnar's cfs - |
| 26 |
> > not to confused with with io schedulers) to see if there is a |
| 27 |
> > difference. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> I'll look into that idea - thanks. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/ |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
for Con's patch use google ;) |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives