| 1 |
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 19:29:43 -0600 |
| 2 |
Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@×××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> llvm < 3.4 is specified for the llvm use flag in mesa. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
That does explain things. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Llvm is used for the gallium part of mesa. So won't this require |
| 11 |
excluding the gallium use flag as well? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I don't use high-end graphics on my system but I recall that some |
| 14 |
time ago I had problems with other stuff if I omitted the gallium |
| 15 |
and llvm use flags on mesa. Otherwise I'd eliminate gallium entirely. |
| 16 |
At that time, I didn't question the reason because I didn't need to know |
| 17 |
and I didn't really care as long as everything worked. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
This condition can only be temporary as future releases of mesa |
| 20 |
will likely use llvm >= 3.4. Since on my system llvm is not used for |
| 21 |
anything else other than mesa gallum, I'll just leave things as they are. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Frank Peters |
Archives