Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FW: GCC4 and -ftree-vectorize
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:02:17
Message-Id: efqr7c$sqh$7@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] FW: GCC4 and -ftree-vectorize by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 "Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> posted efqqvt$sqh$6@×××××××××.org,
2 excerpted below, on Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:51:41 +0000:
3
4 > -ftree-vectorize just came up on the gentoo-dev list.
5
6 ... And here's something from Flame-eyes (and Donnie) on x86 (and PPC) and
7 amd64 specifically...
8
9 < quote from Flame-eyes >
10
11 On Sunday 01 October 2006 18:49, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
12 > I can't give you reasons, but I can tell you it totally broke my x86
13 > system a while back.
14 -ftree-vectorize on x86 and PowerPC is known to create broken executables
15 (when it comes to actually create the executable). I'm using it on AMD64
16 fine since 4.0 pre-releases though (suggested for the daredevils by
17 Halcy0n iirc), and never had problems with it. Most likely this is due
18 either to the usual limitations of x86 (registers, PIC, 387 fpmath), or to
19 not be able to ensure the availability of extra instructions on x86.
20
21 </quote>
22
23 --
24 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
25 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
26 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
27
28 --
29 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list