1 |
"Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> posted efqqvt$sqh$6@×××××××××.org, |
2 |
excerpted below, on Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:51:41 +0000: |
3 |
|
4 |
> -ftree-vectorize just came up on the gentoo-dev list. |
5 |
|
6 |
... And here's something from Flame-eyes (and Donnie) on x86 (and PPC) and |
7 |
amd64 specifically... |
8 |
|
9 |
< quote from Flame-eyes > |
10 |
|
11 |
On Sunday 01 October 2006 18:49, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
12 |
> I can't give you reasons, but I can tell you it totally broke my x86 |
13 |
> system a while back. |
14 |
-ftree-vectorize on x86 and PowerPC is known to create broken executables |
15 |
(when it comes to actually create the executable). I'm using it on AMD64 |
16 |
fine since 4.0 pre-releases though (suggested for the daredevils by |
17 |
Halcy0n iirc), and never had problems with it. Most likely this is due |
18 |
either to the usual limitations of x86 (registers, PIC, 387 fpmath), or to |
19 |
not be able to ensure the availability of extra instructions on x86. |
20 |
|
21 |
</quote> |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
25 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
26 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |