| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 14:13 -0400, Alvin Thompson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:21 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: |
| 3 |
> > It looks like it's not. My cpuinfo has this: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> oh, ok. so what optimizations would be best for the 32-bit version? |
| 8 |
> athlon-xp? i686? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
athlon64 (or k8), if you have >=gcc-3.4, athlon-xp otherwise. Athlon64 |
| 12 |
(or k8) just enables a set of optimizations, it doesn't force a bitness. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Daniel |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives