| 1 |
It is not needed, I believe, with new kernels. Remnants from the earlier |
| 2 |
days, in my case. I am still mostly on 2.6.11 kernel with devfs, actually, |
| 3 |
and am used to combinations udev+nodevfs, devfs+noudev (which had quite |
| 4 |
magical interactions between themselves, BTW) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:21:52 +0100 |
| 8 |
> DR GM SEDDON <gavin.m.seddon@×××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > >Not really, you can use initramfs in place of initrd. I have in |
| 13 |
> > >grub.conf |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > >title=Gentoo Linux 2.6.13-r3 UDEV |
| 16 |
> > >root (hd0,0) |
| 17 |
> > >kernel /kernel-2.6.13-gentoo-r3 root=/dev/ram0 ramdisk=16384 |
| 18 |
> > >init=/linuxrc real_root=/dev/sda2 vga=3847 udev |
| 19 |
> > >initrd /initramfs-2.6.13-gentoo-r3 |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I've notice that some ppl are putting udev on the kernel line. I was |
| 22 |
> under the impression that this was not needed to get udev working? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -- |
| 25 |
> bruce |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives