Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Richard Freeman <rich@××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Problems with pam-0.99 upgrade
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:04:27
Message-Id: 472DB4C5.60100@thefreemanclan.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Problems with pam-0.99 upgrade by Mark Knecht
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Mark Knecht wrote:
5 > OK, knowing as you all do that I'm a non-admin sort of person these
6 > sort of instructions - the
7 > 2 paragraphs at the end - scare me. I hate having to guess what anyone means.
8 >
9 > lightning pam.d # qfile -o /etc/pam.d/*
10 > /etc/pam.d/gdmconfig
11 > /etc/pam.d/xdm
12 > lightning pam.d #
13 >
14
15 I was having the same problems earlier in the week. The solution is
16 actually pretty simple. The output above indicates that xdm and
17 gdmconfig aren't being used any longer - they're orphans. I just moved
18 the files elsewhere (for temporary safe-keeping), and upgraded PAM, and
19 there were no issues. All the files that used the obsolete functions
20 were upgraded some time ago apparently - but if you have a system that
21 has been upgraded year-after-year apparently there are orphan files that
22 date WAY back...
23
24 However, I agree that PAM is one of those things that everybody depends
25 on but otherwise seems to behave like black magic for most people. I've
26 yet to see a guide on PAM that actually makes it easy to understand.
27 (There are TONS of guides that ATTEMPT to make it easy to understand,
28 but every one I've seen falls far short). I considered it a major
29 accomplishment when I was able to hack my sshd PAM config to restrict
30 logins to a list of particular accounts...
31 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
32 Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
33 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
34
35 iD8DBQFHLbS3G4/rWKZmVWkRArPOAJwPJuIUe8tJkacz5jmyzaImNFaTjgCdF8k/
36 ++g0HXiS7/ZPaUOMk6YY+OA=
37 =q/hy
38 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachments

File name MIME type
smime.p7s application/x-pkcs7-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Problems with pam-0.99 upgrade Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
[gentoo-amd64] Re: Problems with pam-0.99 upgrade Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>