| 1 |
On 11/5/07, Mark Haney <mhaney@××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I unmasked and built the .23 kernel last week sometime and everything |
| 3 |
> has been working great. However, I noticed over the weekend something |
| 4 |
> bombing right around udev startup with the |
| 5 |
> /etc/udev/rules.d/40-fuse.rules being invalid (or something similar). I |
| 6 |
> can't seem to find the log that shows the error message (it wasn't in |
| 7 |
> dmesg) but is anyone else seeing this? Is it safe to pull that rule |
| 8 |
> out? What do I need to do to fix it? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I don't have that file; my FUSE rules are in |
| 11 |
/etc/udev/rules.d/99-fuse.rules. Are you sure that file is not an old |
| 12 |
one not removed in an update? What says the following command? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
equery b /etc/udev/rules.d/40-fuse.rules |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If it doesn't belong to any package, you can (and should) remove it. |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 19 |
Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives