Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: A different Openoffice Build problem
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:23:31
Message-Id: ei0ods$op0$2@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: A different Openoffice Build problem by felix@crowfix.com
1 felix@×××××××.com posted 20061028213931.GA12171@×××××××.com, excerpted
2 below, on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 14:39:31 -0700:
3
4 > I'll think about this ... I am going to be away from the machine for a
5 > while and this is not a good time to start massive rebuilds or need to fix
6 > it up afterwards. OOo is not even a low priority with me. Once in a
7 > while I get powerpoint jokes in the mail, but that's about it. Even aside
8 > form that, it's a big hairy program, and I was mostly curious about the
9 > difference in speed.
10 >
11 > Nevertheless, apparently I do have some things to fix, and even if I don't
12 > care much about OOo itself, it may be a good canary for other problems.
13
14 That's pretty much where I'd be at as well. I don't need an office suite
15 and don't have one merged. If I did, it'd likely be koffice. However,
16 the canary thing is what would bother me, until I had it all traced down
17 to what it was anyway, in which case I'd have it about fixed, so...
18
19 --
20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
21 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
22 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
23
24 --
25 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list