1 |
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Barry Schwartz |
2 |
<chemoelectric@×××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> skribis: |
4 |
>> ok, I tried ekopath: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> UCBFAIL indicates problems! |
7 |
>> /tmp/usbtest/ccos_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in COS(X) at line 444 for generic |
8 |
>> /tmp/usbtest/cexp_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in EXP(X) at line 444 for generic |
9 |
>> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in ceild at line 701 for double |
10 |
>> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in coshd at line 701 for double |
11 |
>> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in floord at line 701 for double |
12 |
>> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output:UCBFAIL clib_DP.output , 25 out of 25 tests |
13 |
>> completed |
14 |
>> /tmp/usbtest/csin_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in SIN(X) at line 444 for generic |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> only 10 out of 14 show UCBPASS! |
17 |
> |
18 |
> That must be what they mean by "Industry proven robustness and |
19 |
> quality" |
20 |
|
21 |
Do you have any info about _any_ system passing this 100% successfully? |
22 |
|
23 |
What about that the code itself might have a bug in it? |
24 |
|
25 |
- Mark |