| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Piotr Pruszczak wrote: |
| 5 |
> Hi, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I have real problem which graphic card to choose |
| 8 |
> for 64-bit Linux |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> It should perfectly work with dual-monitor configuration, my customer |
| 11 |
> wants to try me to configure machine for uStation-J (Bentley GIS software) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Price is NOT so important. Problem is this should WORK good @ |
| 14 |
> high-resolutions, full colours && optimum performance on 64-bit system. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Do you have any ideas ?? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Many thanks... I know it's almost off-topic, but I have no idea which |
| 19 |
> card to choose.. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Perfect would be 256MB, with fast GPU. and NOT Matrix - as it is NOT |
| 22 |
> well supported for LInux since it has new Parhelia cards (as I heard) |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Regards, |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
How do you define "High resolution" personally I get 1280x1024 on 2 17" |
| 28 |
TFT Screens on a 256mb Nvidia card using twinview.(6600). My screen res |
| 29 |
is restricted by the screens, not the card which seems fast enough. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
- -- |
| 32 |
Neil Stone |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Systems Administrator |
| 35 |
FlashTek UK |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- |
| 38 |
Version: 3.1 |
| 39 |
GIT d+(++) s: a-(?) C++++(--) UL++++$ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+ |
| 40 |
o+ w--- O M PS+ Y+ PGP++ t+ 5+ X+ R+ tv+ b- DI++ D+++ G |
| 41 |
e h--- r+++ y++++(**) |
| 42 |
- -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK----- |
| 43 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 44 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 45 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
iD8DBQFEfSXGz3Av8JKgzxQRAuR/AKCmYFbEsCPlz/xhcuwKNIXiKVR7/QCggzX3 |
| 48 |
UPxtbBMO+6l46QHnPwA+Dc0= |
| 49 |
=HMzU |
| 50 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 51 |
-- |
| 52 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives