Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] scons build failure
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:33:15
Message-Id: 5bdc1c8b0810211733u7723674dye2a4eaebe8e4e0ba@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] scons build failure by Justin
1 On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Justin <justin@×××××××××.net> wrote:
2 > Mark Knecht schrieb:
3 >> Anything I should try to do about this?
4 >>
5 >> Thanks,
6 >> Mark
7 >>
8 >> Saving to: `/usr/portage/distfiles/scons-1.0.0.tar.gz'
9 >>
10 >> 100%[======================================>] 541,330 682K/s in 0.8s
11 >>
12 >> 2008-10-20 18:18:02 (682 KB/s) -
13 >> `/usr/portage/distfiles/scons-1.0.0.tar.gz' saved [541330/541330]
14 >>
15 >> * checking ebuild checksums ;-) ... [ ok ]
16 >> * checking auxfile checksums ;-) ... [ ok ]
17 >> * checking miscfile checksums ;-) ... [ ok ]
18 >> * checking scons-1.0.0.tar.gz ;-) ... [ ok ]
19 >>
20 >>>>> Unpacking source...
21 >>>>> Unpacking scons-1.0.0.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/scons-1.0.0/work
22 >>>>> Source unpacked.
23 >>>>>
24 >> * The ebuild phase 'unpack' has exited unexpectedly. This type of behavior
25 >> * is known to be triggered by things such as failed variable assignments
26 >> * (bug #190128) or bad substitution errors (bug #200313).
27 >>
28 >> * Messages for package dev-util/scons-1.0.0:
29 >>
30 >> * The ebuild phase 'unpack' has exited unexpectedly. This type of behavior
31 >> * is known to be triggered by things such as failed variable assignments
32 >> * (bug #190128) or bad substitution errors (bug #200313).
33 >> lightning ~ #
34 >>
35 >>
36 > On my system it works. Do you have enough space in /var/tmp/portage?
37 >
38 >
39 I think so. Seems to be about 2GB.
40
41 lightning ~ # df
42 Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
43 /dev/sda2 9614148 6742592 2383180 74% /
44 udev 10240 184 10056 2% /dev
45 /dev/sda6 3850292 777652 2877052 22% /usr/src
46 /dev/sda8 14428928 11630740 2065224 85% /home
47 /dev/sda13 48070472 33619600 12008996 74% /mnt/NewMusic
48 shm 508016 0 508016 0% /dev/shm
49 /dev/sda5 38456308 22950852 13551956 63% /home/mark/backups
50 lightning ~ #
51
52 Answering Duncan's question about portage versions I'm a bit behind:
53
54 lightning ~ # eix -Ic portage
55 [I] app-portage/portage-utils (0.1.29@06/28/08): small and fast
56 portage helper tools written in C
57 [I] sys-apps/portage (2.1.4.5@10/14/08): Portage is the package
58 management and distribution system for Gentoo
59 Found 2 matches.
60 lightning ~ #
61
62 How would I put in the debug echos? I know nothing of this stuff.
63
64 Probably before I do that I should at least update portage.
65
66 Note also, in case it's important, that I'm somewhat concerned about
67 python on this machine. I've been getting some strange messages about
68 locales that I don't understand. Probably they are unrelated to this
69 problem but better to disclose it now as they are the only ongoing
70 problem I've got that I've not found a solution for. They show up when
71 running something like layman to do an overlay update:
72
73 lightning ~ # layman -s pro-audio
74 * Overlay "rostov" is missing a "description" entry!
75 * Overlay "rostov" is missing a "description" entry!
76 * Overlay "rostov" is missing a "description" entry!
77 * Overlay "rostov" is missing a "description" entry!
78 * Running command "/usr/bin/svn update "/usr/portage/local/layman/pro-audio""...
79 svn: warning: cannot set LC_CTYPE locale
80 svn: warning: environment variable LANG is en_US
81 svn: warning: please check that your locale name is correct
82 At revision 1344.
83 *
84 * Success:
85 * ------
86 *
87 * Successfully synchronized overlay "pro-audio".
88 lightning ~ #
89
90 Here's my /etc/locale.gen file
91
92 lightning ~ # cat /etc/locale.gen
93 #en_US ISO-8859-1
94 en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8
95 lightning ~ #
96
97 Note that I used to have the ISO-8859 included but after recent
98 updates CUPS stopped printing from computers across the network. I had
99 to remove it to allow my family to print.
100
101 Again, probably not related but better to get this out there so we can
102 disregard it.
103
104 Thanks all,
105 Mark

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] scons build failure Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>