1 |
Paul Stear posted on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:14:10 +0100 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Thanks Duncan, I hope you do not have problems but can still help me. |
4 |
|
5 |
FWIW, I'm upgrading in the background right now. I'm doing it twice, |
6 |
~amd64 on my main machine, and ~x86 on the image (on my main machine, but) |
7 |
for my netbook, some 270+ packages on each, including the non-kde ones (I |
8 |
don't run a full kde or it'd be more). |
9 |
|
10 |
FWIW, there were some issues with mysql reported, tho they /should/ be |
11 |
fixed with the latest versions of everything. That would affect akonadi/ |
12 |
kaddressbook/kmail, which I run, and amarok, which I dumped due to |
13 |
developers more interested in more features I didn't want (after removing |
14 |
several I used) than in the fact that they were breaking it for the amd64 |
15 |
segment of their userbase, back when they switched to mysql-embedded. |
16 |
|
17 |
IMO, you'll be better off choosing a simpler music player, unless of |
18 |
course you actually /use/ all that database functionality, scoring, |
19 |
wikipedia artist lookup, etc, and value it above having a player that |
20 |
actually /works/ for playing /music/. After a bit of research, I went |
21 |
with mpd and a few chosen front-ends, in part so I could have |
22 |
uninterrupted play when I wasn't running X and when I was, but there's all |
23 |
sorts of players for all sorts of styles. And unless your style exactly |
24 |
matches the amarok one, it's very likely simply way too many complex |
25 |
dependencies to be worth running it. But if amarok's your style, by all |
26 |
means, continue to use it! It's just not mine and even when I was running |
27 |
it back in kde3, I found it rather bloated for my tastes. But the switch |
28 |
to mysql-embedded was the last straw for me, so I switched, and am very |
29 |
glad I did. =:^) |
30 |
|
31 |
More on the rest when I'm done with the upgrade... |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
35 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
36 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |