| 1 |
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: |
| 2 |
> Damn those pesky developers. ;) |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> When will they learn the solution is not to mask out CFLAGS it's to produce |
| 5 |
> a patch so the package works with the user's desired CFLAGS. :P |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Oh, I'm sure the openoffice folks would be very glad to receive a patch |
| 8 |
that fixes the issues with -O{0,1,3,s} from you. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Seriously, there are more pressing matters than CFLAGS horkage. It's |
| 11 |
often simply not worth the time to fix these issues properly. Being able |
| 12 |
to specify your own CFLAGS is a cool thing, but it's rather a |
| 13 |
side-effect than a major goal. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Kind Regards, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Simon Stelling |
| 19 |
Gentoo/AMD64 developer |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives