1 |
"Martin Herrman" <martin@×××××××.nl> posted |
2 |
40bb8d3b0810201037q75b3cb5dkaf16b5a6a5f5dd73@××××××××××.com, excerpted |
3 |
below, on Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:37:15 +0200: |
4 |
|
5 |
> I came up with the idea that maybe burning the iso image to CD has |
6 |
> failed, so I downloaded the iso again and... discovered that I was using |
7 |
> 2008.0 instead of 2008.0-r1.. So I downloaded the latest one, burned it |
8 |
> on CD and started the install again. Emerging the kernel sources now |
9 |
> works :-) |
10 |
|
11 |
Hmm... I hadn't thought of a bad ISO image or burn. I guess I take it |
12 |
for granted that people verify the md5 and/or gpg sig. I know I always |
13 |
do on such downloads. (Portage of course verifies ebuilds and tarballs, |
14 |
tho AFAIK not the eclasses or profiles.) |
15 |
|
16 |
I'm glad the -r1 worked for you, tho. FWIW, since Gentooers generally |
17 |
incrementally update, those LiveCDs and stages don't always get as well |
18 |
tested as they should. Particularly the LiveCDs, since people can |
19 |
install from other Linux instead (as I did, back in 2004). |
20 |
|
21 |
FWIW, I'm going to be doing an install of my own pretty soon. AA1 (Acer |
22 |
Aspire One) netbook. But I plan to create an image on my main machine |
23 |
(dual dual-core Opteron, 8 gigs RAM, 4-way kernel/md RAID, yada yada, |
24 |
obviously the one I want to compile on compared to the puny netbook) and |
25 |
more or less just copy it over. So I'll be using a LiveCD (actually |
26 |
LiveThumbdrive) of some sort, maybe Gentoo's maybe something else, to do |
27 |
the partitioning and copying, but build the stuff to copy from x86 stages |
28 |
on my existing amd64 machine, in a 32-bit chroot. |
29 |
|
30 |
Once that (relatively mild) challenge is conquered, I'm /contemplating/ |
31 |
(but haven't really looked into yet) a /real/ challenge, cross-compiling |
32 |
Gentoo to run on my Linksys WRT54GL router (200 MHz mipsel, 4 meg flash, |
33 |
16 meg ram, tho there's a hardware mod to add an sdcard for several gigs |
34 |
of (removable) storage that I'm looking at), currently running OpenWrt. |
35 |
OpenWrt is nice and has a lot of flexibility... but it has been /years/ |
36 |
since I used that sort of init system, and I just like the idea of having |
37 |
Gentoo on it. =:^) Obviously, that'd be a cross-compile from my main |
38 |
machine as well, tho equally obviously, it'd be a /much/ slimmed down |
39 |
version I actually installed, and I'd not be worried about compiling |
40 |
everything and its brother to run on it, narrowing the challenge a bit. |
41 |
|
42 |
> I have used slackware, redhat, mandrake and debian before (in that |
43 |
> order) and about 2 years ago switched to Ubuntu because it was so easy |
44 |
> to use. But it's also bloated (it is even hard to compile your own |
45 |
> kernel) and that's why I started to use Gentoo 2 months ago on my |
46 |
> notebook. I liked it (compared to FreeBSD: that ports system is |
47 |
> documented so badly..)! |
48 |
|
49 |
Interesting. There's a BSD guy on my ISP's (Cox) newsgroups that keeps |
50 |
telling me how much better they are. Philosophically I'm a copyleft guy, |
51 |
so the BSDs don't so interest me, but it's interesting to hear the other |
52 |
side of the story after seeing his pro-BSD comments for so long. FWIW, |
53 |
there's a Gentoo/FBSD alternative if you're interested in that sort of |
54 |
thing. It's basically Gentoo's ebuild system on a FBSD kernel. AFAIK, |
55 |
you can either go GNU userspace and just run the FBSD kernel, or run |
56 |
mainly FBSD, but with the prefix portage and packages and its basic GNU |
57 |
dependencies (bash, and there may be other GNU dependencies as well, I'm |
58 |
not sure) as an alternative packaging system, not replacing the main FBSD |
59 |
system. There are similar Gentoo-prefix ports in various stages of |
60 |
maturity for OSX and I believe OpenSolaris, among others. |
61 |
|
62 |
> I plan to compile my own kernel (as I did years ago before using |
63 |
> ubuntu), but are currently using genkernel to have my system at least |
64 |
> running well. When install is finished, I will configure the kernel on |
65 |
> my own. |
66 |
|
67 |
That makes sense. When I did it, I just figured why go to the trouble of |
68 |
figuring out genkernel, when I already knew how to do my own kernels, so |
69 |
that's what I did, bypassed genkernel entirely, and did my own kernel. |
70 |
For the first year or so tho, I continued to use the Mandrake lilo |
71 |
bootloader (binary simply copied over to my Gentoo install), as grub |
72 |
wasn't yet popular when I started on Mandrake and I didn't learn it until |
73 |
some time after I was on Gentoo, but lilo wasn't yet available on Gentoo |
74 |
64-bit. |
75 |
|
76 |
Gentoo's nice for those that like to tweak and don't like the bloat of |
77 |
most binary distributions but want the packages the thin ones don't |
78 |
have. But the first install to a system (even if it's your second or |
79 |
more system with Gentoo) can be a monster! |
80 |
|
81 |
-- |
82 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
83 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
84 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |