| 1 |
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:18:48 -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > That sounds a good plan, but why do you need multiple VGs? Why not put |
| 4 |
> > all the swap partitions in one VG then create one LV on each PV? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> That would also work - having separate VGs helps ensure each swap device |
| 7 |
> ends up on its own physical device. It could certainly be done using |
| 8 |
> explicit device assignments when creating LVs. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
That's what I was thinking of, it saves cluttering your system with |
| 11 |
unnecessary VGs. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ralph's Observation - It is a mistake to allow any mechanical object |
| 18 |
to realize that you are in a hurry. |
Archives