Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Sean Johnson <gutenpress@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:48:46
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. by Matt Randolph

That must be for the folk that don't mind patching glibc, but will get
upset if memcpy does strange things. :)

On 7/23/05, Matt Randolph <mattr@×××××.com> wrote:
> Oh, and I take no responsibility for any damages to anyone or anything > arising from the use of the revised memcpy.c or software produced from > it. It may contain further errors that I don't know about. > > Matt Randolph wrote: > > > There is a bug in the original memcpy.c that will cause a segfault if > > you don't pass it any parameters. Here is a fixed version. I've left > > everything else alone (except for a spelling correction). > > > > -- > "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" - W. of O. > > -- > gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list > >
-- gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc. Matt Randolph <mattr@×××××.com>