Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: libungif and giflib conflict.

[Nick Currier]

Looks like that got it guys. Thanks tons for the help.... It seems I broke
portage by running only part ~amd64 packages. revdep-rebuild found it but it
took twice to fix..... depclean wants to get rid of tons of stuff though so
I'm thinking this is a bad idea or I have bigger problems.... Kudos to AMD64
Gentoo for the best support team in open source.

Nick

On 11/1/05, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
>
> Brian Litzinger posted <20051101173928.GA13381@localhost>, excerpted
> below, on Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:39:29 -0800:
>
> > Been ~amd64 since the day I got this laptop.
> >
> > The last time I hit the problem was on
> >
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 21 14:43 /usr/lib/libungif.so.4 ->
> > libgif.so.4.1.3
> >
> > when I finally got tired and created the link.
> >
> > Thus on Oct 21st at 13:43 (PST) you could still experience the
> > problem as a ~amd64 type.
> >
> > I got slapped in the face as a small child for filing a duplicate
> > bug. Thus I am, as an adult, unable to file bugs. :(
>
> Did you do what I and others have suggested, a revdep-rebuild? Note that
> existing packages on your system may still be linked against the old
> library. Once it's in their binaries...
>
> revdep-rebuild (as with anything portage related, run it with the -p the
> first time thru to see what it's going to do) is designed to scan your
> existing binaries to see what they need, and your existing library path
> (that ld uses to find the libs it needs) to see what's provided. Then it
> makes a list of all the binaries (both executables, and libs that load
> other libs) that have unfilled dependencies using the existing libraries,
> traces down the packages they belong to, and remerges them (or with -p,
> displays what it would merge), the intent being to recompile and relink
> anything that's missing dependencies, either linking against new or
> alternate versions of same, or pulling in the required dependencies to
> merge as well.
>
> Of course, this only works once that library has gone missing. If you run
> revdep-rebuild with the library (or a symlink pointing to an alternate)
> still there, it'll think everything is fine and not list the package
> owning the library in question for remerge.
>
> Decently updated packages that formerly linked against libungif should now
> link against libgif without difficulty. However, with existing package on
> the system linked against libungif, it's only to be expected that said
> binaries would have issues. The easiest way to fix them is to run
> revdep-rebuild. In fact, revdep-rebuild, along with emerge --newuse
> --update --deep world, should be a regular part of the routine to keep a
> well maintained and upto date system.
>
> (Another part of the same routine should be emerge depclean, but be sure
> the revdep-rebuild and emerge --newuse are completed first, and check the
> output of a --pretend depclean for stuff you know you want to keep around,
> before letting it do its thing. Then run revdep-rebuild again afterward,
> just to be sure.)
>
> These apply to some degree to everyone, but a bit less to slower moving
> stable, than to faster moving ~arch. Since ~arch may merge three versions
> for every version that goes stable, including beta and rc versions on
> occasion, cruft tends to buildup rather faster than it will on a stable
> system.
>
> --
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
> http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
>
>
> --
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list
>
>