1 |
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:22:33 -0500 |
2 |
Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> |
5 |
> Take a look at this page: |
6 |
> http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Downgrade_Glibc |
7 |
> |
8 |
> And also this forum topic: |
9 |
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-845000-start-0.html |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
Thanks for these links. |
13 |
|
14 |
What a mess! In my case there would be no problem because |
15 |
absolutely nothing was built against the new glibc. |
16 |
|
17 |
However, I found another solution. I did not realize that |
18 |
Gentoo offers a binary OpenOffice package. Installing |
19 |
this openoffice-bin package now gives me an OpenOffice |
20 |
that starts with the new glibc update. |
21 |
|
22 |
So the new question is why does the binary from OO/LO |
23 |
fail to start while the Gentoo binary shows no problem? |
24 |
AFAIK they are the same package, but the directory structures |
25 |
are different. |
26 |
|
27 |
Anyway, I'm glad to have OO running. |
28 |
|
29 |
Frank Peters |