1 |
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 14:40 -0500, Mark Haney wrote: |
2 |
> Duncan wrote: |
3 |
> > "Mark Haney" <mhaney@××××××××××××.org> posted |
4 |
> > 4951001C.10602@××××××××××××.org, excerpted below, on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 |
5 |
> > 10:13:32 -0500: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >> Duncan wrote: |
8 |
> >>> "Mark Haney" <mhaney@××××××××××××.org> posted |
9 |
> >>> 494FE6D7.2060408@××××××××××××.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 22 Dec |
10 |
> >>> 2008 14:13:27 -0500: |
11 |
> >>> |
12 |
> >>>> I've been updating my system after having some surgery and taking time |
13 |
> >>>> off from everything and I've noticed a funny thing. Certain packages |
14 |
> >>>> are requiring that I install v2.1.4.5 or portage (I'm running 2.1.6.2 |
15 |
> >>>> now) before updating the other packages. Why is that? |
16 |
> >>> So you're saying they're asking you to downgrade? Do you have an |
17 |
> >>> example and is it in the main tree or some overlay (which)? |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> >>> What I suspect is happening is that it's depending on a specific |
20 |
> >>> portage version, say =2.1.4*, instead of a slot, which portage should |
21 |
> >>> support everything at least in the main tree. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> >> It seems anything java related and mplayer as well. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> >> octavian ~ # emerge -uav ant-core |
26 |
> >> |
27 |
> >> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
28 |
> >> |
29 |
> >> Calculating dependencies... done! |
30 |
> >> [ebuild UD] sys-apps/portage-2.1.4.5 [2.1.6.2] USE="-build -doc |
31 |
> >> -epydoc (-selinux)" LINGUAS="-pl" 0 kB *** Portage will stop merging at |
32 |
> >> this point and reload itself, |
33 |
> >> then resume the merge. |
34 |
> >> [ebuild U ] dev-java/ant-core-1.7.1-r2 [1.7.0-r1] USE="-doc -source" |
35 |
> >> 6,828 kB |
36 |
> >> |
37 |
> >> --- |
38 |
> >> Calculating dependencies... done! |
39 |
> >> [ebuild UD] sys-apps/portage-2.1.4.5 [2.1.6.2] USE="-build -doc |
40 |
> >> -epydoc (-selinux)" LINGUAS="-pl" 0 kB [ebuild U ] |
41 |
> >> dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.6.0.11 [1.6.0.07] USE="X alsa (-nsplugin) -odbc" |
42 |
> >> 0 kB |
43 |
> >> |
44 |
> >> ---- |
45 |
> >> [ebuild UD] sys-apps/portage-2.1.4.5 [2.1.6.2] USE="-build -doc |
46 |
> >> -epydoc (-selinux)" LINGUAS="-pl" 0 kB [ebuild U ] |
47 |
> >> media-video/mplayer-1.0_rc2_p28058-r1 [1.0_rc2_p27725-r1] USE="X a52 aac |
48 |
> >> alsa arts ass%* dvd encode iconv ipv6 jpeg mad mmx mp3opengl png |
49 |
> > |
50 |
> > Hmm... I'm running the portage-2.2-rcs, unmasked as I had started using |
51 |
> > the set dependencies before it was masked to get more ~arch testing for |
52 |
> > 2.1.6*, and I don't see it trying to downgrade portage when I emerge -p |
53 |
> > any of those here. So it's not a direct portage version issue. |
54 |
> > |
55 |
> > Do you happen to have a version of portage in either package.unmask or |
56 |
> > package.keyword? You're normally running stable, right? Portage-2.1.6* |
57 |
> > is keyworded ~arch, so if you're normally running stable but had 2.1.6* |
58 |
> > for some reason and don't have it in package.keywords, that's why it's |
59 |
> > trying to downgrade. |
60 |
> > |
61 |
> |
62 |
> Well, I had the 2.2_rc series for a while so I could upgrade to KDE |
63 |
> 4.1.3. Then, I moved to 2.1.6.2 when the 2.2 series was pulled from |
64 |
> ~arch. I don't see anything in portage in particular in |
65 |
> package.keywords or package.unmask about portage. I just manually |
66 |
> updated to the ~arch version of portage (using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS from the |
67 |
> CLI). Should I add portage to package.keywords to make this go away? |
68 |
> |
69 |
Probably. I've seen things like that with other packages. |
70 |
|
71 |
Regards, |
72 |
Ferris |
73 |
-- |
74 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
75 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) |