| 1 |
Greetings again, Thanks to all who responded. I will now tell the |
| 2 |
rest of the story: I would have no problem leaving the D-Link NIC in, |
| 3 |
but the resulting system after compilation still does not like the |
| 4 |
forcedeth, cannot seem to detect the D-Link as eth1, and, hence, does |
| 5 |
not load its 'stge' driver (produced for Linux by D-Link). The |
| 6 |
result---no network. Has anyone seen this? |
| 7 |
GAG |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On 5/24/06, Neil Stone <neil@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 11 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 12 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Kirby Walborn wrote: |
| 15 |
> > Adam James wrote: |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> >>> As far as I can remember, it worked fine for me with |
| 18 |
> >>> `install-amd64-minimal-2006.0.iso'. I'm afraid I can't confirm this as |
| 19 |
> >>> it died not so long ago. |
| 20 |
> >>> |
| 21 |
> >>> --Adam |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > I will confirm that it worked fine for me on the minimal amd64 cd also. |
| 24 |
> > -- |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > Kirby |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Worked for me, but that was a 2005.0 minimal CD... |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> - -- |
| 31 |
> Neil Stone |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Systems Administrator |
| 34 |
> FlashTek UK |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> - -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- |
| 37 |
> Version: 3.1 |
| 38 |
> GIT d+(++) s: a-(?) C++++(--) UL++++$ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+ |
| 39 |
> o+ w--- O M PS+ Y+ PGP++ t+ 5+ X+ R+ tv+ b- DI++ D+++ G |
| 40 |
> e h--- r+++ y++++(**) |
| 41 |
> - -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK----- |
| 42 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 43 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 44 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> iD8DBQFEdLD4z3Av8JKgzxQRAh0GAJ9lCmMX1Wn57zioYjs+F24eCjGDGgCeJzCs |
| 47 |
> u1sSk5QShfzXHWXBa+qu9JA= |
| 48 |
> =JwSg |
| 49 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 50 |
> -- |
| 51 |
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
-- |
| 56 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives