| 1 |
On Monday 07 August 2006 01:36, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Marcel Treis <marcel@×××××××××.de> posted |
| 3 |
> 200608062325.53716.marcel@×××××××××.de, excerpted below, on Sun, 06 Aug |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I have that merged here, same flags as you, save version you are trying. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> However ldb-4.2 indicates your db package may be the problem. Note that |
| 8 |
> db is slotted. I have 4.3.29-r2 (only) here. You may have several |
| 9 |
> versions merged. It looks like it's trying to use 4.2. and finding a bad |
| 10 |
> *.la file. Try remerging that (using the --oneshot parameter) or |
| 11 |
> upgrading to 4.3, unmerging 4.2, and doing a revdep-rebuild. Note that db |
| 12 |
> isn't an uncommon dependency and the minor versions are compile time |
| 13 |
> compatible but run-time incompatible, meaning once you unmerge 4.2 |
| 14 |
> revdep-rebuild may have several packages to remerge so they build against |
| 15 |
> 4.3. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Thanks for the hint, i now have subversion-1.3.0 running. |
| 18 |
The problem was that i didnt know the "db"-package was the berkeley-db. So |
| 19 |
with that information provided by you i could play around with db, portage, |
| 20 |
neon and stuff... ;-) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Thanks to you, i finally got 'layman -a portage-xgl' running. *g* |
Archives