1 |
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:40:59 -0500 |
3 |
> Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Honestly, there is no shortage of people offering their opinions. |
7 |
>> What there is a shortage of is people actually doing work to make |
8 |
>> (e)udev do anything differently. In the end people can complain as |
9 |
>> much as they want, but unless they fork over effort or dollars or |
10 |
>> something they won't get terribly far. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Work? What work? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I have never used udev/eudev/mdev or anything similar and, if I am allowed |
16 |
> to nave a choice, I never will. |
17 |
|
18 |
You will always have that choice, since the software is free. |
19 |
|
20 |
> Manually creating a /dev tree that perfectly reflects ones own system |
21 |
> is rather trivial. That's how Linux used to be and that's how Linux, |
22 |
> for the most part, still is. There is, or at least should be, no need |
23 |
> for udev or any substitute for udev. |
24 |
|
25 |
If you want to create a /dev tree for a computer that never gets new |
26 |
hardware connected via USB, bluetooth, or another bus, yeah, it's |
27 |
pretty trivial. |
28 |
|
29 |
Too bad that kind of computer is going the way of the dodo. |
30 |
|
31 |
> IOW, udev should be developed as a nice, helpful option for those who |
32 |
> want such nice, helpful options. But it always should be just that: optional. |
33 |
> Once it stops being a choice then we begin to deviate greatly from |
34 |
> the once sacrosanct principles of free software. |
35 |
|
36 |
We agree on that one. Of course, if a distribution wants to support as |
37 |
many users as they could, they probably will choose the nice, helpful |
38 |
options. |
39 |
|
40 |
The alternatives will be always available, of course. It's just that |
41 |
perhaps no distribution will want to do the "rather trivial" work of |
42 |
generating a static /dev tree for *your* computer. |
43 |
|
44 |
But is rather trivial, isn't it? So it doesn't matter. |
45 |
|
46 |
Regards. |
47 |
-- |
48 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
49 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
50 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |